OfficeBooks

Tier 1 · Facts, dated

Owned by OfficeBooks. A vendor may propose a correction to a fact — never to a score or a rank.

ChatGPT / Codex Review 2026: OpenAI's GPT-5-powered coding agent — CLI, IDE, and cloud tasks bundled into a ChatGPT subscription

AI Coding Agents · Cloud & Dev

Last checked · vs chatgpt.com/codex/pricing
Watch price

Free. Nobody pays for this alert, and we send nothing until you confirm.

Price from
Free Vendor: “$0 (limited free tier)”
Free plan
Yes
OfficeBooks score
4.3 / 5 our editorial opinion How we score
G2
Not available Not in our review data. We show a G2 score only after reading it on a profile with 10 or more reviews.
Trustpilot
Not available Not in our review data. We show a Trustpilot score only after reading it on a profile with 10 or more reviews.
Last price change
Not available No change recorded since the first reading we hold (14 Jul 2026).

Last checked 14 Jul 2026 — offers change often, so confirm the current price on the vendor’s site before buying.

We verify

List prices and plan names as written, whether a lasting free plan exists, the billing unit where the vendor states it, third-party scores with 10+ reviews, and the page and date we read them.

We do not verify

Negotiated discounts, regional prices and taxes, anything behind a sales call, how well features work (we read documentation; we do not test), uptime, support or security. Opinions on those live in Tier 2.

ChatGPT / Codex plans, in the vendor's words

PlanPriceIncluded
Free$0Limited trial access to the Codex agent via web, CLI, IDE extension and iOS; no cloud task features.
Go$8/moLightweight coding tasks with higher limits than Free.
PlusPOPULAR$20/moPractical entry point for regular Codex use: full cloud tasks and GPT-5-series models, metered in 5-hour rolling windows; extend with ChatGPT credits.
ProFrom $100/mo$100 for 5x Plus limits, $200 for 20x; access to the GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark research preview.
Business / Enterprise$25/user/mo ($20 annual, 2-seat min)Team admin, SSO and no training on your data by default. Enterprise/Edu is custom, quote-only (contact sales).

Price history · every reading logged

We hold one reading of this price, so there is no history to chart yet. We will not draw a curve from fewer than two points.

All readings (1)
Every reading we hold of ChatGPT / Codex's listed price
DateResultRead on
First reading we hold: “$0 (limited free tier)” chatgpt.com

In the same category · prices, each dated, side by side

Open all three in a Decision Room

Sources read: chatgpt.com/codex/pricing, learn.chatgpt.com/docs/pricing, eesel.ai/blog/codex-pricing, uibakery.io/blog/openai-codex-pricing, chatgpt.com/pricing, chatgpt.com/codex, help.openai.com/en/articles/6950777-what-is-chatgpt-plus, help.openai.com/en/articles/9793128-what-is-chatgpt-pro, help.openai.com/en/articles/11989085-what-is-chatgpt-go (last read ).

How these numbers are read and dated

  1. We open ChatGPT / Codex's own pricing page, chatgpt.com/codex/pricing, and record prices, plan names and the free plan as written, with the date.
  2. A vendor's correction or a reader's report changes nothing until an editor has checked it.
  3. Scores and rankings are editorial: vendors cannot buy them or correct them.
  4. After 30 days without a new reading, this page stops calling the facts verified (the page is rebuilt daily).
Read the full methodology

Verification log

Full log
  • First reading we hold

Are you ChatGPT / Codex?

Propose a correction to a price, free plan or billing unit, with evidence from your own site. An editor reads it before anything changes; a correction never touches a score or a rank.

Open the vendor portal
Spotted a wrong number?Report it

Tier 2 · Voices (opinions)

Written by people. Signed, dated, and kept apart from the facts above.

Who writes what on this page: each source, who writes it, their incentive, and what OfficeBooks checks
SourceWho writes itTheir incentiveChecked by OfficeBooks?
Editor's verdict and reviewOfficeBooks research desk. Desk research from documentation; no hands-on test.A commission only on links to partner programmes, disclosed beside the link. It never changes a score. Yes · It is ours: every figure in it comes from the sources listed.
Creator stacksIndependent creators, named on every takeWhatever each creator declares on each take: none, a commission, sponsorship or employment. OfficeBooks credits them with the clicks and demo bookings they refer. Partly · The facts beside their take, read live. Not their opinion; an editor reviews each stack before it is listed.
G2 and Trustpilot ratingsThose platforms' reviewersSet by each platform. Some invite or reward reviews. Partly · Only the score and review count, on the date shown. We do not vet the reviews.
Sponsored slotThe vendor who booked itPaid placement. No · The copy is the vendor's. Labelled "Sponsored · not ranked"; never in a table, score, shortlist or search result.
Facts, dated (Tier 1)OfficeBooks research deskNone. Vendors cannot pay to change a fact, a score or a rank. Yes · On the vendor's own pages where it publishes them, otherwise on the sources listed; always with the date.

Editor's verdict

updated

“A top-tier AI coding agent that is hard to ignore if you already pay for ChatGPT, spanning CLI, IDE, web and autonomous cloud tasks on frontier GPT-5 models. The main friction is pricing: rolling-window caps and opaque token-credit metering make real costs unpredictable, and there is no way to buy Codex on its own.”

Best for

  • Developers already inside the ChatGPT / OpenAI ecosystem
  • Delegating asynchronous cloud coding tasks like refactors and PRs
  • Teams wanting a coding agent bundled with an existing ChatGPT plan

Watch out for

  • Usage is metered in 5-hour rolling windows, so an intense session can hit caps mid-task
  • Token/credit billing is opaque; heavy real-world cost (~$100–200/dev/mo) is hard to predict up front
Read the full review

Creator stacks featuring ChatGPT / Codex

All stacks

Are you a creator who uses ChatGPT / Codex?

Publish your stack: your take, next to these dated facts. We credit the clicks and demo bookings you refer.

Create a stack

Creator takes belong to their authors and are not verified by OfficeBooks; each creator declares their tie to the vendor on every take. OfficeBooks earns a commission only on links to partner programmes, disclosed beside each link. None of this changes Tier 1.

The full review

ChatGPT / Codex website, captured by screenshot service

What is ChatGPT / Codex?

ChatGPT is OpenAI's general-purpose AI assistant, and Codex is the coding agent built into it. The pitch on the Codex product page is simple: the same agent that answers questions in chat can plan and complete engineering work end to end, building features and handling complex refactors and migrations, powered by OpenAI's frontier coding models. As of this review, the plans page lists the GPT-5.6 model family, from GPT-5.6 Luna on the Free tier up to GPT-5.6 Sol Pro reasoning on the Pro plan.

Everything ships under one subscription: chat, voice, image generation, deep research, and agentic coding across web, desktop, and mobile apps.

One agent in chat, IDE, and terminal

Codex follows you wherever you write code. Inside the ChatGPT desktop app it works as a command center for agentic tasks; the Codex IDE extension brings the same agent into your editor; and the Codex CLI installs with a single npm command for terminal-first developers. All three surfaces connect through your ChatGPT account, so it is the same agent everywhere you code. The product page currently leads with a Windows download for the ChatGPT app, alongside the IDE and CLI paths.

Parallel agents, worktrees, and background work

Codex product page on chatgpt.com describing the coding agent, multi-agent workflows, and plan options

The Codex feature list reads like an operations manual for multi-agent development. Built-in worktrees and cloud environments let several agents run in parallel across projects, and OpenAI claims this compresses weeks of work into days. Scheduled runs pick up routine chores such as issue triage, alert monitoring, and CI/CD upkeep. With Skills, you teach Codex your team's standards and workflows once, and it applies them consistently with less supervision. The testimonial wall features engineers at Duolingo, Ramp, Sierra, and Cisco Meraki, with Ramp reporting that Codex PR reviews catch bugs their team would have missed and Duolingo finding it caught hard bugs that other review bots missed.

More than a coding tool

Because Codex rides on a ChatGPT subscription, the rest of the assistant comes with it. The plan comparison lists voice with video, image generation, file uploads, data analysis, deep research, memory that spans past chats, projects, scheduled tasks, and custom GPTs you can create and share. ChatGPT Work appears on every tier, from limited desktop-app access on Free and Go to desktop, web, and mobile access on Plus and Pro. Business plans add connectors for Microsoft 365, Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, Linear, and Figma, so the assistant can draw on company knowledge and internal tools.

How the plans divide up

ChatGPT pricing page with Free, Go, Plus, and Pro tiers plus a Business and Enterprise tab

Free covers unlimited everyday text chats with limited Codex access, enough to evaluate the agent honestly. Go widens message, upload, and image limits and lengthens memory, though OpenAI notes the plan may include ads. Plus is the sweet spot for individual developers: advanced reasoning with GPT-5.6, expanded Codex usage, projects, scheduled tasks, and custom GPTs. Pro is pitched at research and coding, with two tiers that unlock five or twenty times the usage of Plus, along with maximum Codex tasks. Business gives teams of two seats or more a secure workspace with SAML SSO, centralized administration, usage analytics with budgeting and spend controls, and a no-training-by-default data policy, while Enterprise layers on SCIM, data residency in ten regions, and 24/7 priority support.

Who should choose ChatGPT / Codex

Choose ChatGPT / Codex if you want one subscription covering both a flagship assistant and a serious agentic coding setup across chat, editor, and terminal. Individual developers get real value at Plus, heavy agent users will find Pro easier to justify, and Business fits teams that need admin controls and connectors into their existing stack. It is not ideal for teams that want a standalone, usage-billed coding agent detached from a chat product, or for organizations standardized on a different model provider end to end. Start with the Free tier's limited Codex access; the upgrade decision then comes down to how often you hit usage ceilings.

Strengths

  • Bundled into ChatGPT subscriptions — no separate bill if you already pay for Plus or Pro
  • Broad multi-surface delivery: terminal CLI, IDE extension, web app, and an async cloud agent
  • Runs on frontier GPT-5-series models with a dedicated coding-tuned Codex variant
  • Genuine free tier lets you trial the agent before committing to a paid plan

Watch out for

  • Usage is metered in 5-hour rolling windows, so an intense session can hit caps mid-task
  • Token/credit billing is opaque; heavy real-world cost (~$100–200/dev/mo) is hard to predict up front
  • No standalone Codex plan — you buy a ChatGPT subscription or pay per-token API rates
  • Business requires a 2-seat minimum and Enterprise pricing is quote-only

Key features

FeatureWhat it does
Cloud coding agentDelegate asynchronous tasks that run in an isolated cloud environment and can open pull requests on their own.
CLI + IDE extensionA terminal agent and VS Code integration for local, in-editor work alongside your existing tooling.
GPT-5-series modelsCoding-tuned GPT-5.x (Codex and Spark variants) reason over whole repositories, not just single files.
Credit-based usage extensionTop up with ChatGPT credits to keep working past your plan's rolling-window limits.

How ChatGPT / Codex compares

AlternativeHow it differs
Claude CodeAnthropic's terminal-first coding agent; the closest head-to-head rival on agentic quality.
CursorAI-first IDE built around an editor rather than a CLI/cloud agent.
GitHub CopilotGitHub-native completion and chat; cheaper entry but less autonomous agent behaviour.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a free version of Codex?

Yes. A limited free tier gives trial access to the Codex agent through the web app, CLI, IDE extension and iOS, but excludes the cloud task features reserved for paid plans.

Do I need a separate subscription just for Codex?

No. Codex is bundled into ChatGPT paid plans (Go, Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise). If you prefer per-token billing, you can also access it through the OpenAI API instead.

ChatGPT / Codex ratings on other platforms

Independent user ratings from third-party review sites, linked here for transparency. These are not our editorial score, are captured on the date shown, and may have changed since.

Tier 3 · Actions

Four ways to act on what you just read. Each one says who pays.

Add to a Decision Room

Compare up to 4 tools with your team: dated prices side by side, your seats and budget, and notes and votes only your team sees.

Free. Nobody pays for rooms, and vendors never see their notes or votes.

Book a demo

ChatGPT / Codex's own site: chatgpt.com

Plain link: we earn nothing from it.

Deal

Free tier available to trial the agent; Plus at $20/mo is the practical entry point for regular use.

Last checked · no end date in our data

Part of our review, and dated.

Email me when this price changes

Free. Nobody pays for this alert, and we send nothing until you confirm.

Visit ChatGPT / Codex

Plain link: we earn nothing from it.

Embed this card

Preview

Free. Creators add data-ref with the referral id from their creator page to be credited for the clicks they send. The card updates when we re-verify and never changes a score.

ChatGPT / Codex
Our rating 4.3/5 · $0 (limited free tier)
Visit